‘Handful’ of GPFG investees could face exclusion under new proposals - NBIM

Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) had more than NOK 10bn invested in companies at the end of 2019 that could be excluded from investment by the fund under new proposals, according to Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM).

The investor revealed the information as part of its response to proposed changes to guidelines for the observation and exclusion of companies from investment from GPFG, stating that any increase in the scope of exclusions may amplify their effect on return and risk.

NBIM manages GPFG under a mandate from the nation’s Ministry of Finance and has been tasked with deciding on the observation and exclusion of companies since 2015, based on guidelines which have been in place since 2004.

The bank noted that the annual return on the benchmark index for equities in the period between 2006-2019 was 0.04 percentage points lower than for a hypothetical benchmark index without exclusions from the GPFG under the 2004 guidelines, which, given the current size of the equity portfolio, amounted to a “loss” of return on the order of NOK2.8bn annually.

Around 144 companies are currently excluded from investment, 106 of which on the basis of product-based criteria.

The new proposals include updates and clarifications to exclusion based upon factors such as human rights, corruption and sale of weapons.

In the face of potentially stricter regulations for exclusion, NBIM called for high thresholds for exclusion and appeared to favour exercising ownership rights as an alternative to observation or exclusion.

The bank also appeared broadly positive about some aspects of the proposed guidelines changes, agreeing with clarifications to the GPFG’s purpose and requirements for coordination with the Council on Ethics.

The response from NBIM said: “Norges Bank agrees with the Commission that the framework established 16 years ago has functioned well, and the Commission’s proposals entail a continuation of the current model. The threshold for exclusion is to remain high.

“The criteria for observation and exclusion shall be based on “overlapping consensus”, which means the guidelines build on fundamental ethical norms that enjoy broad support. They also provide a high threshold for adding new exclusion criteria. Companies will continue to be assessed individually, and the assessments are to be forward-looking.”

    Share Story:

Recent Stories

How the US’s robust securities law can benefit European investors
Over recent years several financial scandals have shocked investors, such as the Danske Bank money laundering case. When a scandal like this occurs, investor returns suffer, which is why many seek redress. Many European investors seek to recover assets lost as a result of securities fraud through U.S. courts, with their robust securities laws.

In this podcast, Jeremy Lieberman, Managing Partner at Pomerantz LLP, talks to European Pensions Editor, Natalie Tuck, about how European investors can use U.S. courts to recover assets lost to securities fraud and the challenges facing investors seeking compensation.

Podcast: Opportunities in Chinese equities
China was the first country to be impacted by the coronavirus outbreak, which lead to its economy plummeting. Since then, however, the country has managed to keep outbreaks of the virus under control, and is experiencing a V-shaped recovery with many areas returning to normal.

In this podcast, David Choa CFA, Head of Greater China Equities at BNP Paribas Asset Management talks to European Pensions Editor, Natalie Tuck, about China, its position within the global economy and the potential institutional investor opportunities within Chinese equities.
Mitigating risk
BNP Paribas Asset Management’s head of pension solutions, Julien Halfon, discusses equity hedging with Laura Blows

Europe’s pensions challenges
Francesca Fabrizi meets Matti Leppälä, Secretary General and CEO of PensionsEurope, to discuss the key aims and objectives of the association today.