Companies' environmental strategies should not face shareholder votes - NBIM

Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) has said it does not agree that companies’ strategic plans related to climate change should be subject to shareholder approval.

A letter from the division of the Norwegian Central Bank, which is responsible for investing the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global, to Institutional Shareholder Services argued that the responsibility was best placed in the hands of the board and management, but added that it would “hold the board to account for managing climate-related risks and opportunities”.

NBIM explained that it would do this by withholding support for the directors’ re-election if the company had experienced material failures in oversight, management or disclosure of climate risks.

A letter from NBIM said: “Where a company’s management or disclosure of climate risks does not meet our expectations, we will consider supporting well-founded shareholder proposals. We will support shareholder proposals that request reasonable disclosure of the company’s governance, strategy, risk exposures, and performance data related to material sustainability risks.

“We will also support shareholder proposals that request the board to develop and implement a policy or framework where its management of a material sustainability risk appears inadequate.”

Furthermore, NBIM outlined its view on CEO remuneration, stating that it preferred for a significant proportion of CEOs’ remuneration to come in the form of shares which are locked in for at least five, but preferably 10, years.

The organisation said it deemed this to be a transparent in which to align the interests of the CEO and shareholders, adding that the strategy could also be compatible with the use of performance conditions in the short-term.

Alongside this insight into how NBIM uses its voting rights, the organisation also impressed the importance of the maintenance of the physical aspect of shareholder meetings despite the rising popularity of hybrid meetings, which provide for remote participation, as the level of accountability offered by in-person events needed to be maintained.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


Podcast: The benefits of private equity in pension fund portfolios
The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, in which stock markets have seen increased volatility, combined with global low interest rates has led to alternative asset classes rising in popularity. Private equity is one of the top runners in this category, and for good reason.

In this podcast, Munich Private Equity Partners Managing Director, Christopher Bär, chats to European Pensions Editor, Natalie Tuck, about the benefits private equity investments can bring to pension fund portfolios and the best approach to take.

Podcast - The power of three: Using Common Contractual Funds to improve tax outcomes for investors
Large asset owners are still investing in equities in a way where they are taxed on their income. The implication is that they get a poorer return. They need to, and can, improve this, but how?

In this podcast, AMX Head of Client and Manager Development, Aaron Overy, and AMX Product Tax Specialist, Kevin Duggan, discuss with European Pensions Editor, Natalie Tuck, about three options to help ensure good withholding tax outcomes for institutional investors.
Mitigating risk
BNP Paribas Asset Management’s head of pension solutions, Julien Halfon, discusses equity hedging with Laura Blows

Europe’s pensions challenges
Francesca Fabrizi meets Matti Leppälä, Secretary General and CEO of PensionsEurope, to discuss the key aims and objectives of the association today.