AIMA welcomes EU Commission’s consultation on reducing cross-border barriers

The Alternative Investment Management Association, the global representative body for alternative asset managers, has welcomed the European Commission consultation on reducing barriers to the cross-border marketing of investment funds.

AIMA said that barriers to the take-up of the so-called ‘passport’ for investment funds have held back growth in the European economy and hurt savers and investors.

It cited the imposition by many EU jurisdictions of registration and notification fees on funds, which can amount to hundreds of thousands of euros annually for individual firms, as a major obstacle to a better functioning single market for investment funds.

These fee costs are often borne by the end investors. AIMA said another significant barrier has been the requirement by some jurisdictions for investment managers to appoint a local agent or representative in order to market a fund there.

AIMA’s statement comes on the day that the European Commission launches a consultation exercise into the cross-border distribution of funds. The consultation forms part of the Commission’s effort to create a Capital Markets Union – a deeper single market for capital in the EU.

The Commission’s consultation paper acknowledges the important role that cross-border investment funds can play in economic growth by channelling scarce capital to infrastructure projects, small firms and other investment opportunities.

“If funds can do business more easily cross border, they can grow and become more efficient, allocate capital efficiently across the EU, and compete within national markets to deliver better value and greater innovation for consumers,” the EC paper said.

AIMA CEO Jack Inglis said he welcomes the Commission’s scrutiny of barriers to the use of pan-European marketing ‘passport’, which have “held back” the growth in the European economy.

“The imposition of registration and/or notification fees on funds or even sub-funds in a great number of EU jurisdictions can cost individual firms hundreds of thousands of euros annually.

“As well as reducing or removing the layer of fees, we also would ask the Commission to consider removing or minimising other administrative and regulatory restrictions on marketing, especially in the case of funds that are marketed solely to professional investors.”

    Share Story:

Recent Stories


Podcast - The power of three: Using Common Contractual Funds to improve tax outcomes for investors
Large asset owners are still investing in equities in a way where they are taxed on their income. The implication is that they get a poorer return. They need to, and can, improve this, but how?

In this podcast, AMX Head of Client and Manager Development, Aaron Overy, and AMX Product Tax Specialist, Kevin Duggan, discuss with European Pensions Editor, Natalie Tuck, about three options to help ensure good withholding tax outcomes for institutional investors.

How the US’s robust securities law can benefit European investors
Over recent years several financial scandals have shocked investors, such as the Danske Bank money laundering case. When a scandal like this occurs, investor returns suffer, which is why many seek redress. Many European investors seek to recover assets lost as a result of securities fraud through U.S. courts, with their robust securities laws.

In this podcast, Jeremy Lieberman, Managing Partner at Pomerantz LLP, talks to European Pensions Editor, Natalie Tuck, about how European investors can use U.S. courts to recover assets lost to securities fraud and the challenges facing investors seeking compensation.
Mitigating risk
BNP Paribas Asset Management’s head of pension solutions, Julien Halfon, discusses equity hedging with Laura Blows

Europe’s pensions challenges
Francesca Fabrizi meets Matti Leppälä, Secretary General and CEO of PensionsEurope, to discuss the key aims and objectives of the association today.