15/06/2011
By Ilonka Oudenampsen
FNV Bondgenoten, the biggest union in the Netherlands and a fierce opponent of the new pension agreement, has presented an alternative for the agreement.
Entitled ‘It can be different, better’, it sets out an alternative plan to reform the pension system which aims to maintain security around the value of the occupational pension, to ensure people can have confidence in the level of retirement income they will get when they stop working.
The union said they want all pension funds to have a buffer of 20% to be able to deal with future shocks on the financial markets without having to immediately cut people’s benefits. These buffers are also important for younger generations and need to be built up again after the last crisis.
The main criticism of the members of FNV Bondgenoten is that the new agreement between the social partners and the Government will no longer offer any security about pension income levels, which will move along with the financial markets and all risks will lie with the employees.
In a statement, FNV Bondgenoten said that the employers get the best deal, as their premium will no longer rise and they do not have to top up the pension pot in times of deficits. “This is not just about paying pension premiums, but to take in setbacks together with the employees, as is the case now.”
Other stories you may find of interest:
Overview 2011: Dutch pension agreement
On 10 June 2011, the Dutch government and social partners signed a new pension contract, which will see the retirement age rise to 66 by 2020 and to 67 by 2025, while more risk is shifted to the members
Germans require education on pensions – Fidelity
Many Germans are clueless about the build-up of their pension, a new study by Fidelity International has shown. The investment company said that despite all the initiatives to improve people’s pensions knowledge, most employees neither know how high their pension will be nor are they familiar with the three pillar pension system
Industry responds to EIOPA consultation
Pension and investment associations across Europe have expressed different views on what they see as the future of cross-border pension provision, as the European Investment and Occupational Pension Association (EIOPA) closed its consultation on the IORP Directive yesterday
